From Communications of the ACM
Digital innovation is not working in the interest of the whole of society. It is time to radically rethink its purpose without…
Filippo Gualtiero Blancato| March 1, 2024
A recent case challenges the long-standing view that application program interfaces are not protectable under copyright law.
Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | March 1, 2015
Considering the implications of the late-2013 ruling in favor of Google in the Authors Guild case.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | March 1, 2014
Considering the negative influence of U.S. statutory damage rules on technology innovation.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | July 1, 2013
A currently pending case will have significant implications for secondary markets in digital goods.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | March 1, 2013
Assessing the first phase of the trial based on claims that Google's Android platform infringes Oracle's Java-related copyrights and patents.
Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | November 1, 2012
Considering the legal responsibilities of Internet intermediaries in the aftermath of the Stop Online Privacy Act controversy.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | July 1, 2012
A case before the European Court of Justice has significant implications for innovation and competition in the software industry.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | March 1, 2012
Reinstituting formalities — notice of copyright claims and registration requirements — could help address problems related to too many copyrights that last for...Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | July 1, 2011
Assessing the controversial results of a recent empirical study of the role of intellectual property in software startups.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | November 1, 2010
Considering the precedent that could be established by approval of the controversial Google book settlement.Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | July 1, 2010
The U.S. Supreme Court will narrow the universe of process innovations that can be patented to those that are "technological," but what will that mean for software...Pamela Samuelson From Communications of the ACM | March 1, 2010