Communications of the ACM
3-D Printed Parts Provide Low-Cost, Custom Alternatives for Lab Equipment
3-D printers built the stands for the aluminum globes that simulate Northern Lights in PPPL's Planeterrella Laboratory.
Credit: Elle Starkman / Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
The 3-D printing scene, a growing favorite of do-it-yourselfers, has spread to the study of plasma physics. With a series of experiments, researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory have found that 3-D printers can be an important tool in laboratory environments.
"The printer is now a crucial piece of our laboratory and used regularly," says Andrew Zwicker, the head of Science Education at Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and lead author of "The Suitability of 3-D Printed Plastic Parts for Laboratory Use," a paper that reports the results in the American Journal of Physics. "The versatility of the printer is such that our first reaction to an equipment need is no longer whether we can find or purchase the required piece of equipment, but can we print it?"
Three-dimensional printers create objects by laying down layers of material, whether plastic, metal, ceramic, or organic. A computer controls a moveable nozzle that extrudes the hot material according to digital computer-aided design files. Each layer is thin, often measuring only several hundred millionths of a meter in height.
Hobbyists have used 3-D printers to build curiosities such as sets of interlocking rings. But researchers have become interested because the printers can build customized parts for experiments, often at very low cost. And because a 3-D printer can produce parts quickly, the time between when a need is recognized and when a part is ready to install can be just a few hours.
During the experiments, Zwicker and his team printed plastic parts, including a cone and a cylinder, to test basic properties such as size, shape, use as an electrical insulator, and ability to operate in a vacuum. The researchers also printed parts for an electrode in a plasma physics experiment, and replacement parts, such as a guard for a cooling fan and a handle for a piece of test equipment. Zwicker needed to see if the parts could withstand moderate vacuum environments in some plasma physics experiments and could withstand physical stresses. The team also needed to determine whether the dimensions of the parts matched the specifications of the designs.
The dimensions proved accurate, but only up to a point: On average, the individual layers were larger or smaller than the specifications by a fraction of a millimeter. While this degree of accuracy was not enough for objects that had to be built with a high level of precision, it was good enough for many laboratory purposes.
The plastic parts passed the vacuum tests and stress tests, too. Zwicker wanted to know if the parts began to emit hydrocarbon gas — as plastics sometimes do — that would contaminate the vacuum and ruin plasma experiments at moderate pressures. But as long as the plastic was kept below 75 degrees Celsius, no hydrocarbon gas was detected.
Next, the team placed small bars of 3-D printed plastic in a machine that tested the ability of a material to withstand pulling, and found that printing did not weaken it. In general, the strength of printed parts matched that of bulk plastic.
Finally, Zwicker found that a 3-D printer was an important tool for producing dielectric insulators for electrodes.
"The ability to print this material in any size, shape, or configuration provided an unmatched flexibility to quickly and efficiently test new configuration ideas for different experimental conditions," Zwicker says.
Coauthors of the American Journal of Physics paper are Josh Bloom, Robert Albertson, and Sophia Gershman.
No entries found