Credit: Getty Images
"Star" employees who demonstrate exceptional performance and enjoy broad visibility relative to industry peers tend to get more than their share of the credit when things go well in a collaborative project, and more of the blame when they don't, according to "Shadows and Shields: Stars Limit Their Collaborators' Exposure to Attributions of Both Credit and Blame," published in the journal Personnel Psychology.
On the other hand, collaborating with a star not only mitigates — but may actually outweigh — the professional status loss associated with collaborative failure.
"What this points to, both for low-performing employees and for managers, is the importance of being very mindful of what is the gain that you're hoping to achieve from a collaboration with a star," says Rebecca Kehoe, associate professor of human resource studies, and co-author of the study.
From Cornell University
View Full Article
No entries found