Scientists and biotech founders made the case for various approaches to prolonging the number of years people might spend in good health at the two-day Longevity Investors Conference in Gstaad, a swanky ski-resort town in the Swiss Alps. The majority of them were trying to win over deep-pocketed investors.
There were 150 people at the meeting, and its organizers said that 120 of them were investors with millions or even billions of dollars at their disposal — and at least a million ready to pump into a longevity project. Plenty of would-be attendees were denied a $4,500 ticket because they didn't meet this criterion, a co-organizer said.
As the field attempts to define itself as scientifically sound, plenty of "anti-aging treatments" based on little-to-no human evidence continue to enter the market. Can billions of investor money offer a concrete path to evidence-based life extension for all?
"The idea is that aging biology is this lever that allows us to dial back on multiple diseases . . . and that would be much better than whack-a-mole medicine," says Martin Borch Jensen, chief science officer at Gordian Biotechnology, which focuses on therapeutics for diseases of aging.
From MIT Technology Review
View Full Article
No entries found