By T. B. Curtz, J. F. Riordan, M. Spohn
Communications of the ACM,
December 1960,
Vol. 3 No. 12, Pages 663-664
10.1145/367487.367510
Comments
An evaluation of an automatic programming method can be made from many points of view. Two recent articles give evaluations of two compilers for the IBM 650 based on the method of decomposition of compiler statements into machine language [1, 2]. This paper briefly describes these two compilers, appraises them for the ease with which they can be used and for the efficiency of the programs they produce. While this approach is of less theoretical interest than the evaluations presented in the referenced articles, it is of substantially more practical significance to a programmer or to an installation which is seeking to answer the following questions: Should a compiler be used? If so, which compiler? It will be noted that no universal answers are possible since such factors as relative costs and availability of machine time and programmer time, the skill and predilections of programmers, and the type of problems are of major importance. Nevertheless, the results presented below, we believe, provide the best available guide for arriving at reasonable answers.
The full text of this article is premium content
No entries found
Log in to Read the Full Article
Need Access?
Please select one of the options below for access to premium content and features.
Create a Web Account
If you are already an ACM member, Communications subscriber, or Digital Library subscriber, please set up a web account to access premium content on this site.
Join the ACM
Become a member to take full advantage of ACM's outstanding computing information resources, networking opportunities, and other benefits.
Subscribe to Communications of the ACM Magazine
Get full access to 50+ years of CACM content and receive the print version of the magazine monthly.
Purchase the Article
Non-members can purchase this article or a copy of the magazine in which it appears.
