By John E. Pomeranz
Communications of the ACM,
July 1970,
Vol. 13 No. 7, Page 451
10.1145/362686.362703
Comments
In [1] the authors use a lemma to prove their Theorem 1 (pp. 352-353). While the lemma is true, there is a defect in its proof, for one cannot assume that each of the symbols appearing as a type IV reference is in t(Ek , s). Using their example (p. 350) as a reference string with k = 12, t(E12 , 3) is 534 and lacks the two symbols (1 and 2) which appear as type IV references.
The full text of this article is premium content
No entries found
Log in to Read the Full Article
Need Access?
Please select one of the options below for access to premium content and features.
Create a Web Account
If you are already an ACM member, Communications subscriber, or Digital Library subscriber, please set up a web account to access premium content on this site.
Join the ACM
Become a member to take full advantage of ACM's outstanding computing information resources, networking opportunities, and other benefits.
Subscribe to Communications of the ACM Magazine
Get full access to 50+ years of CACM content and receive the print version of the magazine monthly.
Purchase the Article
Non-members can purchase this article or a copy of the magazine in which it appears.
