By Paul Pritchard
Communications of the ACM,
January 1984,
Vol. 27 No. 1, Pages 53-57
10.1145/69605.357970
Comments
Programs attributed to Wirth and Misra for generating the prime numbers up to a specified limit are investigated. It is shown that Wirth's program is incorrect according to three increasingly weak criteria, and a composite number is exhibited that the program accepts as prime. This is the smallest known counterexample, and could not have been found by the usual method of program testing—the program would run for trillions of years on the fastest computer before reaching it! Closely related counterexamples are given to a conjecture of Misra concerning his program. An appendix gives a particularly simple algorithmic proof of the Chinese remainder theorem.
The full text of this article is premium content
No entries found
Log in to Read the Full Article
Need Access?
Please select one of the options below for access to premium content and features.
Create a Web Account
If you are already an ACM member, Communications subscriber, or Digital Library subscriber, please set up a web account to access premium content on this site.
Join the ACM
Become a member to take full advantage of ACM's outstanding computing information resources, networking opportunities, and other benefits.
Subscribe to Communications of the ACM Magazine
Get full access to 50+ years of CACM content and receive the print version of the magazine monthly.
Purchase the Article
Non-members can purchase this article or a copy of the magazine in which it appears.
