As we take on the role of overseeing the area of computing education within Communications' Contributed Articles Editorial Board, we see an opportunity to expose the broader computing community to the state of knowledge in our field. No matter where you work, or what your job is, education is important; important not only in what is taught, but also how it is taught and who is taught. For example, what is known about how different groups of people learn computing? How does workplace learning differ from formal educational settings? What techniques have been shown effective for teaching or probing learners' knowledge about computing? What seemingly obvious approaches actually fail under the scrutiny of research-informed practice? Depending on different contexts, these questions will have different answers. Investigating those answers requires us to think (as individuals and as a community) about the methods that are appropriate for studying educational questions and, crucially, what problems do we most need to think about so that our education and training keeps pace with developments in CS?
We seek to explore questions such as these, to show good work in computing education, and to help those outside the field to appreciate what makes for strong contributions in computing education. Computing education research is inherently interdisciplinary, combining technical knowledge about computing with insights from cognitive science, psychology, economics, general education, up to and including the domains in which computing is applied. As such, it is a hybrid field, and this can be disorienting as meaningful results may appear in a variety of specialist research venues that many computer scientists will not read. We embrace the broader vision of Communications as a place the computing community can come to stay abreast of areas other than its own and are excited to make computing education a part of that vision.
No entries found