Communications of the ACM

Editor's letter

Cracks in Open Collaboration in Universities

By Andrew A. Chien
Communications of the ACM, January 2020, Vol. 63 No. 1, Page 5
10.1145/3374766
Comments

Universities and the interchange of scholars and students in international collaborations have long played an important role in knitting a fabric of human relationships and shared understanding. This fabric is fraying rapidly.

In recent Communications' editorials (January and September 2019), I called out rising political tensions and conflict that challenge international open collaboration in the university. My objective was to inspire the computing community to come together and address these rising challenges.

In the past six months, the situation has worsened with accelerating economic decoupling betwixt China and the U.S., increasing political conflict, and the persistent reality that China's political system is not evolving toward openness or democracy. Instead, China's growing economic and military strength appears to embolden assertion of international power and internal crackdowns.^a,b,c,d Analysts increasingly opine that China lacks the internal civil stability essential to be a good global economic partner. The U.S. has moved to restrict technology flow and investment from allies to China. Directly, a growing strategic consensus believes competition between U.S. and China is shaping the world into two Internets, separated by a new "Berlin wall."^e These two models for the Internet differ in control (government control vs. open), companies (Baidu/Tencent/Alibaba vs. Google/Facebook/Amazon), and increasingly on their technology base.^f

Back to Top

What Are the Implications?

U.S. government actions to restrict technology flow (export control) are reducing the ability of universities to collaborate with some foreign corporations and organizations. Programs instituted to combat intellectual property theft create new reporting requirements. Funded research by corporations on the "entity list" is prohibited, causing Huawei to disband its U.S. research organization.^g Collectively, these actions have a chilling impact on collaboration and create rising anxiety. China's government-rhetoric and action against its own citizens in Xinjiang and Hong Kong reminds the world the government maintains power by force within China and through intimidation campaigns abroad. The resulting tensions produce covert and overt suppression of open communication and learning.^h,i,j

There is surprising growth of Internet application bubbles that feed Chinese students abroad a steady stream of censored facts and spin from behind the "Great Firewall"; see, for example, "College Daily."^k

Back to Top

How Can We Protect Collaboration?

In a peacefully integrated and globalized world, nationality need not be apparent. In a world with national military and "no rules" economic competition, nationality takes on critical importance in technologies of direct military and economic importance—such as many dimensions of computing (AI, cybersecurity, HPC). In such a world, we must do three things to protect open collaboration: 1) Community members must be open and transparent about nationality (citizenship) so others can fulfill their responsibilities; 2) all must recognize that nationality (citizenship) confers responsibilities that should be respected by the community; and 3) communities should talk about sensitive areas and design policies/structures that are inclusive where possible, but draw clearly defined and understood boundaries where necessary. If we do not address these problems, solutions will be imposed upon us. Without these steps, the risk is that distrust will grow, undermining the relationships and trust that make open collaboration so fruitful.

Andrew A. Chien, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Back to Top

Back to Top

The Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2020 ACM, Inc.

---

No entries found